Risk
了解 Dan Gardner 的《Risk》（Risk）：2007-02-22–2026-11-01 的 Hacker News 数据中有 8 次提及、3 位讨论者。阅读原文摘录、比较不同观点，将它加入你的书单。
分享到 X社区里的声音
最近 8 条来源记录提及不等于推荐。标签来自源数据的自动分类；请打开原始讨论核对上下文。
此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接，请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接，请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接，请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文Risk: the science and politics of fear. By dan Gardner I've recommended, and reviewed, it here before. Basically it is a pop-science look at how humans react and view fear. Brilliant read with lots of good referecing to scientific papers etc. It was almost as revelatory to me as the selfish gene.
在 Hacker News 阅读原文Agreed. This is an excellent book: http://www.amazon.com/Risk-Science-Politics-Dan-Gardner/dp/1... on the subject (I've recommended it a few times before)
在 Hacker News 阅读原文Risk, the science of politics and fear by Dan Gardner (absolutely fantastic book, I already mentioned it on here earlier in the year). The Game (again). I read this regularly to remind me of a few things - it's the book that originally got me fascinated in human interaction. Nemesis (Richard Mullers theory) after a recommendation on HN. A couple of Obama's books (seemed logical to read up on him)- dreams of my Father I especially liked. Snowball (though still chugging through that). In Search of Schrodinger's Cat - a book all about the evolution of quantum theory (and one that gives me my favourite quote of the year: In 1905 Einstein actually published 5 times. The fifth being his PHD dissertation; yes those three individually genius works, which shook the very foundations of physics, were published my a man called Mr Einstein. Despite th…
在 Hacker News 阅读原文Amazon Link (in case ppl struggle to find it) http://www.amazon.co.uk/Risk-Science-Politics-Dan-Gardner/dp...
在 Hacker News 阅读原文Tell HN: Risk, Dan Gardner Hey Guys, I just finished reading Risk (The Science of Politics and Fear) by Dan Gardner and figured I should recommend it as a great read. I wouldn't normally recommend a book here but I suspect it is the kind of book a lot of people would dismiss as not-relevant to the hacker sort of mentality (I thought the same). Basically it sums up the Human reaction to perceived risk. One way to describe the whole thing is how many people, after seeing a coin land heads up 5 times in a row will bet it has a higher chance of landing heads up again next time - regardless of the random aspect. The most interesting thing I found in the book though was when he presented common "risk puzzles" where our gut causes a knee-jerk answer to a posed question. Several times I thought "that's silly, I'd never fall for that" only to read…
在 Hacker News 阅读原文