International Economics
了解 Krugman 的《International Economics》（International Economics）：2007-02-22–2026-11-01 的 Hacker News 数据中有 3 次提及、3 位讨论者。阅读原文摘录、比较不同观点，将它加入你的书单。
分享到 X社区里的声音
最近 3 条来源记录提及不等于推荐。标签来自源数据的自动分类；请打开原始讨论核对上下文。
此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接，请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接，请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文Are there any well-regarded economists who think the infant industry argument is a good argument? Mankiw mentions it briefly in The Principles of Economics [1], which if I recall correctly is the most widely-used economics textbook, saying "Economists are often skeptical about such claims, largely because the infant-industry argument is difficult to implement in practice...many economists are skeptical about the infant-industry argument in principle...Protection is not necessary for an infant industry to grow." Paul Krugman spends a few pages on it in International Economics: Theory and Policy [2], saying "The infant industry argument seems highly plausible, and in fact it has been persuasive to many governments. Yet economists have pointed out many pitfalls in the argument, suggesting that it must be used cautiously. First, it is not alw…
在 Hacker News 阅读原文