真实讨论 · 值得阅读English

Why Is Sex Fun?

了解 Jared Diamond 的《Why Is Sex Fun?》(Why Is Sex Fun?):2007-02-22–2026-11-01 的 Hacker News 数据中有 8 次提及、3 位讨论者。阅读原文摘录、比较不同观点,将它加入你的书单。

THE HACKERBOOKS LIBRARY
Why Is Sex Fun?
Jared Diamond
科学与数学

Why Is Sex Fun?

8 次提及 · 3 位讨论者 · 3 位推荐者

图书版本信息

社区里的声音

最近 8 条来源记录

提及不等于推荐。标签来自源数据的自动分类;请打开原始讨论核对上下文。

TTichy
推荐 · 来源标签

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
Ddedalus
推荐 · 来源标签

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
TTichy
推荐 · 来源标签

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
TTichy
推荐 · 来源标签

…de evidence, it would still be interesting to discover a reason for the things being like they are. At least I think so. Have you read Jared Diamond "Why is sex fun" or "The Third Chimpanzee"? I didn't have the impression that what he said about the competitions of the sexes were just-so stories, although in some cases there were several different theories. I would be interested in examples of what you mean by "just-so-stories", too.

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
TTichy
普通提及

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
Rradu_floricica
推荐 · 来源标签

It's the sex separation thing: men and women do stuff differently. Evolutionary speaking it's a very interesting and complicated game. I recommend "Why is sex fun?" by Jared Diamond for a crash course. Any short answer I'd give would be wrong in some way, so I'll just say once again: sexes are different. Don't make the mistake to think this is less important in modern times. It's not. It's just a bit more complicated.

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
TTichy
推荐 · 来源标签

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
TTichy
普通提及

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文