Neural networks for pattern recognition
了解 Christopher M. Bishop 的《Neural networks for pattern recognition》(Neural networks for pattern recognition):2007-02-22–2026-11-01 的 Hacker News 数据中有 8 次提及、6 位讨论者。阅读原文摘录、比较不同观点,将它加入你的书单。
分享到 X社区里的声音
最近 8 条来源记录提及不等于推荐。标签来自源数据的自动分类;请打开原始讨论核对上下文。
此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文… work in somewhat different domains and so have a different list of books. I hope someone finds this useful. For those who want a summary, Proof Technique (a)Velleman's "How to Prove It" (b)Gries and Schneider's "A Logical Approach to Discrete Math" Math (c) Calculus (best "lite" book - Calculus by Strang (free download), best "heavy" books - (d) Calculus by Spivak, (e) Principles of Mathematical Analysis a.k.a "Baby Rudin") (f) Discrete Math (ALADM above + (g) a good book on Algorithms, Cormen will do - though working through it comprehensively is ... hard! (h) Linear Algebra (First work through Strang's book, then (i) Axler's) (j) Probability (see Bradford's very comprehensive recommendations) and (k) Statistics (I would reccomend Devore and Peck for the total beginner but it is a damn expensive book. So hit a library or get a bootlegge…
在 Hacker News 阅读原文my recommendations (for neural networks) would be as follows: - parallel distributed processing (PDP group vol 1 & 2) - simon haykin (Neural Networks and Learning Machines) - christopher bishop (Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition)
在 Hacker News 阅读原文I agree about #2. I have Russell and Norvig and agree that it is an excellent book, but I am not sure how much overlap there truly is here. I also do not have PRML, but Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition by Bishop is excellent (and includes many non-NN related items). ESL is excellent and, to me, the best modern text in machine learning. It covers many of the topics in PCI both at a reasonable level and in much more depth and provides MANY references (100s?) to dig deeper.
在 Hacker News 阅读原文