真实讨论 · 值得阅读English

Measure for Measure

了解 William Shakespeare 的《Measure for Measure》(Measure for Measure):2007-02-22–2026-11-01 的 Hacker News 数据中有 4 次提及、3 位讨论者。阅读原文摘录、比较不同观点,将它加入你的书单。

THE HACKERBOOKS LIBRARY
Measure for Measure
William Shakespeare
文学与科幻

Measure for Measure

4 次提及 · 3 位讨论者 · 0 位推荐者

图书版本信息

社区里的声音

最近 4 条来源记录

提及不等于推荐。标签来自源数据的自动分类;请打开原始讨论核对上下文。

NNickRandom
普通提及

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
668c12c16
普通提及

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
668c12c16
普通提及

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
AAllocator2008
批评 · 来源标签

…ps the most over-rated play write ever. Sure he wrote a few good plays - 'Hamlet', 'Othello', a few other tragedies of note. But most of his stuff was pretty mediocre - 'Measure for Measure' for instance - or outright sucked - 'Romeo and Juliet' perhaps being one of the worst plays ever conceived. Compared to say, Sophocles of old, or, in our time, people like Harold Pinter or Edward Albee, Shakespeare was a hack pulp fiction paperback play write who wrote a small number of adequate plays and a large number of really poor plays. Even his best, 'Hamlet', was itself meandering and hard to decipher - Hamlet is crazy, but one thinks he is just pretending to be crazy, however, after a few viewings (or readings) one figures out he is actually in point of fact crazy (insane). But this point could have been made with more clarity and brevity whic…

在 Hacker News 阅读原文